Pekka Buttler, 02/2024

Specifications
The table below summarizes the lens’ key specifications (measurements based on pictured lens):
Brand: | MIR/MИP | Lens name | 38B/38Б 3.5/65 |
Focal length(s) 1 | 65 mm | Angle-of-view 2 | 66 ° (on medium format) ≈35 ° (on ‘full frame’) |
Maximum Aperture | f/3.5 | In Production | 1978–≈1993 (all variants) 1978–1979 (this version) |
Lens mount (this lens] | Pentacon 6 | Other lens mounts: | Kiev 88 |
Length 3 | 68,2 mm | Diameter 4 | 75,2 mm |
Filter ring diameter | 72 mm | Weight | 566 grams |
Lens element count | 6 | Lens group count | 5 |
Aperture blades (S/R/C) 5 | 6 S 6 | Focus throw | 240 ° |
Minimum focusing distance | 50 cms | Maximum magnification | 1:5,5 |
Has manual aperture ring | YES | Has Manual focus ring | YES |
Aperture mechanism type | Automatic | Aperture click stops 6 | 3.5-4-5.6-8-11-16-22 |
Further notes:
• The MIR-38B/V is a medium format (film) lens, meaning that its image circle is designed to cover at least 54×54 mm (what is typically referred to as 6-by-6).
• The MIR-38 was produced for two mounts:
• The MИP-38Б (translates to MIR-36B) was offered for the Pentacon Six mount, while
• the MИP-38В (translates to MIR-38V) was offered for the Kiev-88 mount.
• For all those who are not comfortable with Cyrillic:
• the Cyrillic letter Б equals the Latin letter B, while
• the Cyrillic letter B equals the Latin letter V, easy as π, eh?
• Optically these two lenses are identical. Due to the differences in mounts and flange focal distances, the rear-ends of Pentacon Six and Kiev-88 variants look slightly different, this even extends to aperture rings being slightly different.
• The MIR-38 design was introduced to replace the earlier MIR-3 design (also a 65 mm f/3.5).
• Both the MIR-38 and MIR-3 are sometimes referred to as “Flektogon copy”. This is correct only inasmuch as they (and almost any wide-angle lens) are derivatives of the retrofocus design introduced almost simultaneously in the Angenieux Retrofocus and Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon. However, there never was a Flektogon that combined a 65 mm focal length with an f/3.5 maximum aperture (the 65 mm Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon for Pentacon Six had a maximum aperture of f/2.8 and while it did also use a six elements in five groups design, the lens elements differ somewhat).
• All production versions of the MIR-38 were manufactured at the Arsenal plant in Kiev (modern day Ukraine).
• The pictured sample (serial 786006) is an early sample, from the first year of production. In fact, it is the lowest serial number among 50+ I have seen by scouring eBay and other forums. If you have an even earlier serial number, be in touch.
• The MIR-name does not refer to a brand, design bureau or indeed a factory. Instead, the name MIR indicates that it is a retrofocus design. See more in the JAPB articles on Soviet lenses and the Soviet lens ‘business’
Versions
Based on a thorough analysis of 50+ copies on eBay and other similar sites, there are not only versions for the two medium format mounts (Pentacon Six and Kiev-88), but also three visually distinct versions.
Version 1 (1978–1979)
As pictured, all-metal construction with focus ring that is scalloped with lengthwise grip ridges. The serial number range of this version I have found is 786006 [my copy] to 794003.

Version 2 (1979–1990)
Otherwise similar, but the focus ring has changed from the pictured to a quadratic, knurled surface (see example here). The serial number range found is 795262–902532.
Version 3 (1991–1993)
Total housing redesign. Rubber focus ring with pronounced ridges on focus ring. Focus distance setting is in a ‘window’ (Takumar-style). Depth of field markings are coloured. Only two samples encountered, one of which has depth of field-markings in green, the other in red.
Interestingly, the first versions (until about 1980) of the MIR-38 also had copper-coloured aperture blades. Thereafter the aperture blades are silvery.

Adapting
If you’ve come into possession of this lens, your sample will either have a Pentacon 6 mount, or a Kiev-88 mount. Here I will discuss adapting the lens in Pentacon 6 mount, but the same principles apply to a lens with the Kiev-88 mount.
To use this lens natively, you will need a Pentacon 6 mount film body. In practical terms this means either a Praktisix or Pentacon Six medium format film camera or a Kiev 60/6C medium format film camera. While neither of these families of bodies were manufactured in their millions, they remain readily available, and even serviceable.
Thanks to the generous image circle Pentacon 6 lenses offer, and thanks to the copious flange focal distance (74,1 mm) of the Pentacon 6 system, this lens can be adapted to every full frame (and smaller) SLR, dSLR and mirrorless camera assuming a suitable adapter can be found or manufactured. Moreover, Pentacon 6 lenses are so uncomplicated that a simple ‘dumb adapter’ will do the job perfectly.
Thanks to the generous image circle, Pentacon 6 lenses have also long been a strong candidate to be used on smaller formats (full frame and smaller) in conjunction with tilt/shift adapters. Alternatively, one can choose to daisy-chain adapters (e.g. Pentacon 6->Canon EF; Canon EF –> mirrorless) which not only broadens the range of available adapters, but also allows using speed boosters for those photographers that use smaller than full-frame sensors.
Finally, regarding larger than full frame, there are also options. Digital medium format is perfectly usable (assuming adapter availability) and many 6×4,5 film formats are likewise theoretical possibilities, but gaining functional adapters may necessitate some DIY.
Footnotes
- Focal length is (unless stated otherwise) given in absolute terms, and not in Full-frame equivalent. For an understanding of whether the lens is wide/tele, see ‘Angle-of-view’. ↩︎
- Picture angle is given in degrees (based on manufacturers’ specs) and concerns the diagonal picture angle. Rule of thumb:
> 90 ° ==> Ultra-wide-angle
70–90 ° ==> Wide-angle
50–70 ° ==> Moderate wide-angle
40–50 ° ==> ‘Standard’ or ‘normal’ lens
20–40 ° ==> Short tele lens
10-20 ° ==> Tele lens
5-10 ° ==> Long tele lens
< 5 ° ==> Ultra-tele lens ↩︎ - Length is given from the mount flange to the front of lens at infinity. ↩︎
- Diameter excludes protrusions such as rabbit ears or stop-down levers. ↩︎
- S=straight; R=rounded; C=(almost)circular at all apertures. ↩︎
- Numbers equal aperture values on aperture ring; • intermediate click; – no intermediate click. ↩︎
Pekka,
Thank You for your assessment of the Mir 38B 65mm f/3.5 Lens.
I have a later Kiev 88 version with copper colored aperture shutter blades. Greenish tinge to the front lens elements, I find it to be a rather sharp compact lens. I use a 72mm metal lenshood and find it works perfect. Along with A HARTBLEI K88 TO P-6 adapter ring, I use it on my EXAKTA 66 & Pentacon 6TL.
I also have a HARTBLEI 65mm f3.5 PCS MC lens bought with a Hasselblad rear mount. The MC on the lens is quite good. I believe the MC is on the front & rear lens element only.
It’s a good option to the scarce CZJ 65mm Flektogon lens. Not sure how it compares to the Mir 38B 65mm f/3.5 Lens in a lens comparsion test.
Hi Evan, and thank you for your comments.
JAPB data sheets mostly try to give dry facts and the odd historical titbit, whereas reviews and more subjective opinions are presented in walk-arounds and reviews.
That said, I can add that the MIR-38B is one of my favourite lenses on the Praktisix/Pentacon Six system, simply because of a) the angle of view is roughly equivalent to 35 mm on full frame which is always my go-to focal length; b) it is – as you also said – reasonably compact and c) I find its image quality to be entirely satisfactory on medium format film.
What needs to be said about my assessment of image quality is that I have never made a side-by-side comparison with the other lenses I have in adjacent focal lengths (50 and 80 mm), and I have never mounted the lens on a digital camera for some pixel peeping. Hence these comments are simply to say that I have never looked at the negatives from my sample and thought “OMG, what mush”.
I do admit that if I ever manage to get this lens, the 65 mm Flektogon and the MIR-3, I am sure to post a comparison.